THE LONG VIEW
War freaks
By Manuel L. Quezon III
Inquirer
Last updated 00:41am (Mla time) 12/03/2007
MANILA, Philippines - Victory has a hundred fathers, but defeat is an orphan. Galeazzo Ciano, Mussolini’s son-in-law, famously wrote that in his diary. Writing in his own diary, Ferdinand Marcos put it another way. “There is nothing as successful as success!” he crowed, two days after he engineered the coup known as martial law. If we tend to adore winners, regardless of how they win, the most contemptible among Filipino traits is our tendency to kick a man when he is down. As soon as Antonio Trillanes IV bowed his head in defeat, the hooting began.
I find it interesting, though, that the hooting took place the moment the government proclaimed victory, and not a moment before. As soon as Trillanes said he would once again go into captivity, the kicking, accompanied by hooting, began. Text messages of a mocking nature began to fly thick and fast, ferocious comments began to be made in the blogs, and all were of the same frame of mind: Trillanes should have been shot, or failing that, he should have shot himself rather than surrender.
This is the same sort of behavior we see on the news, every day: a snatcher is apprehended, and only after the culprit is in the hands of the authorities do suddenly indignant citizens parade before the cameras, taking turns slapping the suspect (who sometimes turns out to have been a hapless bystander).
Because it’s worth a thousands words, this column includes this picture. From the moment I saw this man on TV, I sensed the Peninsula takeover was doomed. Coups can’t involve clowns. And this is why I think the best description for the whole thing was that it was a caper, “an activity or escapade, typically one that is illicit or ridiculous.”
Whether or not Trillanes and Danny Lim honestly believed, that Romulo Neri would suddenly show courage and join them in order to spill the beans on the President; or that the senator and the general had reason to think their bolting their trial would trigger defections within the Armed Forces; or if they actually thought people would throw caution to the winds and join them in the hotel, before either men had made it clear what, exactly, they wanted: fact is, the moment this man in the wig made his appearance, the whole thing was obviously destined to be a farce.
But the capering wasn’t solely the doing of the rebels. I’d have said that the biggest damned fool in the country last Thursday was Senator Trillanes, except there was a bigger damned fool, and that was Vivian Yuchengco. If Generalissima Yuchengco were calling the shots, we would have had a blood bath courtesy of that stock market virago. Curiously, the real soldiers in the Armed Forces washed their hands off the whole matter: never have so many generals been so obviously tongue-tied as they were that day. Even the police, true to form, decided to restrict their bullying to unarmed civilians from the media, while treating the holed-up senator and his companions with kid gloves.
I do believe Trillanes crossed a line a mature appreciation of his being a senator should have prevented him from crossing. But what now? Should he resign, or be removed from the Senate?
On what grounds? For being a brat, when he got upset because he hasn’t been allowed to do his work and serve in the Senate? Lito Lapid and Bong Revilla have all the freedom in the world and have nothing to show for their being in the Senate anyway, except their continued affiliation with the administration. Or is Trillanes a bully, and thus, no longer qualified to be senator? Maybe, because he doesn’t do his bullying in lawyerlike fashion like Juan Ponce Enrile or Joker Arroyo.
Trillanes has been judged lacking in judgment, in being ill-tempered, ill-mannered and brash—a lunatic. A Miriam Defensor-Santiago. And yet Santiago is there, so obviously allegations of lunacy per se can’t be an obstacle to continued public service or promotion to international bodies. Party affiliation is the difference between eccentricity and lunacy.
Should he remain in office, because he has a mandate? But Juan Miguel Zubiri is there, so obviously 11 million genuine votes mean nothing, anyway. So, we are left with President Macapagal-Arroyo’s favorite line, “let he who is without sin, cast the first stone,” and her favorite loophole: if you are affiliated with the administration, throwing stones is perfectly legal and to be encouraged.
So maybe this explains why those scared to death between 1 p.m. and 3 p.m. on Thursday, ferociously demand blood, now. It’s a numbers game, and never mind if the numbers seemed missing for those crucial few hours, because nothing succeeds like success!
As the government prepares to throw the book at Trillanes, maybe that man with the wig was far less ridiculous than he seemed at first blush. What’s a man in a wig compared to the officials and their friends, who wanted it all to end, not with a whimper the way it did, but with oceans of blood and as much destruction as possible? What’s an incoherent, posturing senator compared to the parade of government Tarzans whose chief regret is they weren’t able to atom bomb Makati?